Skip to main content

Physics - Vibrations

Image result for vibration


Are all vibrations 'good'?

- A 'good' vibration depends on who's involved! If good = beneficial, then no, not all vibrations would benefit all involved parties equally. The vibration which brings down a bridge is not good for the bridge, the workers, or anyone on the bridge. It is good for me, in that it's incredibly interesting and makes me wonder whether my humming could ever stop traffic, or if a cat's purr could cause an electric can opener to operate.


Resonance in my world

About 2 weeks after our class on vibrations, I got to use the new information in a dream. There was a guy who was showing me his new personal sound device – the ear buds were just tiny pieces of cheap styrofoam he broke off to put into my ears. No cords or anything. I asked him if they worked because they were attuned to the resonance of the player. He said no, the pieces of foam were sentient and only worked if they enjoyed what was being played.

I went to a musical event for the summer solstice, where I heard an unearthly beautiful acapella group sing very old songs under a vaulted ceiling. The resonance they created - when I closed my eyes, I could feel everything around me vibrate: the singers, the ceiling, the pews, the other people, my own heart and bones. They stirred a resonance in the seen and unseen in a way I'm not sure I want to understand. Some things are better suited for mystery.


Connections I can make between energy & qi

I feel like the subject of energy ~ qi is a loaded one! Like everything western vs eastern, there is no tidy apples to apples comparison, but instead occasional pieces of overlap. Energy is qi...sometimes. Qi is energy....sometimes. But this is a gross simplification of both concepts.

- Both are units of measurement, describing a force inside and outside of ourselves.
- Though immaterial, this force is easily influenced by everything from unconscious intent to the more mechanical workings of the lungs.
- Both can be cultivated, directed and condensed/dispersed.
- Either can be pathological or beneficial, depending on location, direction, and intent.
- Both may be transferred from one medium to another: ie food into fuel, or sound wave to a single, measurable point.
- Both may be transferred easily, period. Between just about anything, although the amount of energy/qi depends on other factors like origination, mass, movement.
- Although I hear about 'conservation of energy', I don't hear much about 'conservation of qi'. More about loss of qi, but that might just be because I'm studying the pathologies of qi, not the behavior of qi on a wider, more holistic scale.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biochemistry Paper: The Microbiome and TCM

ACCHS Biochemistry Summer 2018 Professor Spears Sarah Donnelly The Microbiome and TCM The microbiome is an enormously interesting area right now. With steadily rising rates of gastrointestinal disorders, despite all the best that western medicine has to offer, people are looking for a solution which isn't worse than the illness. Clostridium difficile (C.diff) infections alone have doubled in the United States in the last decade. There are many variables which can contribute to all this gut-sickness, but the underlying problem is our western medical model. Our current model, with the finest technology and equipment at its disposal, has distilled all functional parts of the human body – flora and fauna, vitamins, probiotics, antioxidants, amino acids and the like – down to their very basest constituents. We have the machines which tell us exactly which nutrients we lack, and we pack it into pills and swallow it down. This is our preventative medicine. The body ...

Physics - Synchronicity

Prompt:  "What evidence can you find for synchronicity Based on what you know, how would you explain connectivity?" This is such an interesting subject. It gets me tangled up and I don't know if I'm able to write about it. How to write a blog post on something I know to be true and real but don't have the vocabulary to describe it satisfactorily to another party.  Who's satisfaction?  Synchronicity depends wholly on the witness - who is viewing it?  A synchronistic event can't be untangled from its viewer(s). Should it be? Does synchronicity need to be recognized?  Any evidence I have for synchronicity is going to be subjective, and describing a subjective experience isn't evidence in a laboratory-objective-textbook way. And that's where I get stuck. I want to come across as very logical and full of right angles, and this subject is very irregularly-shaped.  This entanglement idea - that teeny tiny bits in me are unfathomably connected to...

Physics: Loafing Around Without Feeling Guilty

Dictionary.com has 'loafing' as 1.  to idle away time: 2. to lounge or saunter lazily and idly This is so easy in theory! In the middle of a class, I'll be dreaming about sleeping in until noon, eating ice cream for breakfast, and staying up late reading trashy novels. In practice, my teenage dreams are mostly beyond the capabilities of my 30-something body. My eyes open at 6am, whether I want it or not; ice cream is now known as 'the triple yin death', and 10pm is really way too late for me anymore.  So I took this assignment to mean do something relaxing that I wouldn't normally do. I planned out a perfect 2-daygetaway for the semester break. This took lots of time to dream about, play with maps and restaurant and beach reviews, all of which was very satisfying. For this, I have realistic goals - I'll be up and to bed early but in between, no one will be able to ask anything of me, and nothing work or school like will be scheduled. I'll hav...