Skip to main content

Biophysics Paper: Quantum Theory & TCM

Image result for string theory gif


Physics/Biophysics 2018 ACCHS
Professor Spears
Sarah Donnelly
TCM & Physics

            Of all the fascinating material covered in this course, it was quantum physics which really stuck with me. The impossibly small world which underlies our macro world is governed by different laws, because when things get very small, apparently they also get very weird. The laws which rule the quantum level can't be applied to the world on our scale, and vice versa. It would like assuming breathing air would be like breathing water. The different worlds just work in different ways.

Some favorite weirdnesses:
      Entangled particles, separated by the globe, will simultaneously react even if only one particle is subjected to a stimuli.
      Molecules can exist in more than one physical state at the same time, temporarily stopping at one particular state when being observed. Is it a wave? Particle? Depends on who's watching and what their expectations are
      All the rules in quantum theory apply no matter if time is moving backwards or forwards. It doesn't really matter.

            This doesn't even touch on the basic weirdness of tiny particles hovering in hierarchical formation around slightly larger particles (comparatively larger; all still very very tiny), just chilling...just making up all matter as we experience it. And that's the kicker. These strange laws in their  tiny world are the building blocks for our universe. At the fundamental level, we are beings made up of very very weird laws. So says science. There's comfort in that. There's also comfort in the fact that so much of quantum theory has been confusing and unanswerable since it was first developed and has been pondered by the best minds of the world. So much is '...and we have no idea why this happens...because...quantum mechanics?'
            These phenomena are not merely strange, but also familiar, like getting a surprise phone call from a long-lost someone you were thinking about not 2 seconds prior to the ring. There is nothing is more familiar to us than uncertainty. In physics, there's a whole principle named for it, because on the quantum level, it's a fact of existence. Physics is uncertain - until it isn't. It allows for, and even expects, for rules to be changed with the emergence of new information. On our human-sized level, we do our best to avoid uncertainty, especially in western (allopathic) medicine. Somewhere along the line, western medicine forgot it began as a science and became a religion: there is a strict hierarchy of power and velvet-rope access to that power; black and white diagnoses; victim-blaming those who have a disease; and the infallible, godlike role of the doctor above. Having experienced the sticky end of that lollipop, I was seeking a different way of looking at sickness and health. I found Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM).
            This medicine is complex, more complex than western medicine. It allows for variation, it allows for individuality, for the affect of the observer, trains us to roll with the unpredictable. And it necessarily has endless variability, because the condition of living is endlessly variable. The medicine is systematic and unpredictable, because living systems are unpredictable, with innumerable variables. It treats what we see, what is underlying, and even expects evolution of the condition – rather than absolute, cold diagnoses. The language of Chinese Medicine is poetic, mystical, and sounds like nonsense when I talk to laypeople. Your frustrated liver attacked your spleen, already vulnerable and weak from thinking too much. Trying to understand something that happens on a quantum level is also confusing to me. But metaphorical or not, the explanation matters less when I see evidence of its action in front of my eyes. TCM is at heart, a very practical medicine. If it doesn't work, don't use it. If it does work, think forwards and backwards to figure out the parameters of the cure.
            How do we approach uncertainty as students of TCM? Our medicine, our very studies, are steeped in uncertainty. The only way we can study is by fully accepting uncertainty. Kind of a culture shock. What do we study? Oh, everything. We are handed several thick, sometimes poorly-translated, endlessly complex books and told that the test will have 20 questions, and everything is fair game. Yes, the books contradict one another, and yes, the books have several different terms for the same concepts, and yes, the books take on a completely different meaning depending on your teacher's teacher's interpretation...but that's life. Literally, this is the study of life – and more interestingly – disease: what happens when life doesn't go smoothly.
            My 80 year old housemate came into clinic with an injured knee – it was swollen – doubled in size, and she had been icing it diligently for a week. She had an appointment with her specialist the next day, because she was barely able to hobble around for short periods before the extreme pain set in. I pulled out my orthopedics textbook and asked her if she wanted to try bleeding on a key point. She certainly did not, until I explained it wasn't really 'bleeding' as she understood it, but just a quick insertion and removal of a needle on the tip of her toe. On her uninjured thigh, I felt around for a specific corresponding point. It should have been surprisingly tender, and it was. I needled both the point on the leg and the toe. She got up from the table, a little unsteady, but once the blood started moving, she was utterly shocked that she felt about a 70% decrease in pain. Kind soul, she didn't really believe it would work but was sweet enough to support me at school. Her doctor didn't prescribe any medication nor procedure for what was now a mild annoyance in her knee. The pain didn't return – and 2 months later she was hiking on glaciers in Alaska.
            These phenomena are just plain weird! I like the word weird to describe both physics and TCM, because it's a better fit than 'strange'. Strange is only mysterious or confusing; weird adds a more mystical, magical association, and this feels more accurate, Einstein even called it 'spooky'. TCM is weird because it's based on an ancient system of medicine which has no context in our culture and time. Yet as the concepts were explained to me – about how emotion, environment, nutrition – all contribute to health, that daily awareness and practices are superior medicine, or simply the fact that the my body WANTS to heal itself – these ring true. There are deep truths I learn in this medicine that aren't addressed western medicine. Like in quantum physics, different rules and language apply, but the effects are still felt on our level. We see frequent evidence of it and chalk it up to deja vu or coincidence. But what if it's simply a set of laws governing something we don't yet have a definition for? Or maybe we do, but no one believes in magic, really. Except every theory in science was seen as magic until we created a better context for it. From Van Leeuwenhoek's wee beasties to Copernicus' heliocentric solar system, explorers had to fight tooth and nail to gain acceptance of the magic we know today as facts.
            Physics uses classical western language to describe our world – the very large and the very small. Physics actively seeks to describe how it all works together. It's sometimes unpredictable, but its the best description we have so far. TCM is a snapshot of the physics in ancient China. It describes the inner world, the outer world, and the spirit world – how it all interacts. Both fields are living, dynamic, evolving with new information and new applications. These disciplines don't dispute the existence of other modalities – western medicine, string theory, extraterrestrials – they are philosophies broad enough to encompass any idea, as long as it works.







Sources:




Quantum Physics and Oriental Medicine.”All About Acupuncture, 1 Feb. 2008, www.acupuncturetoday.com/mpacms/at/article.php?id=31666.


Emergence.”Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 11 Aug. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence.


3 Concepts Ancient Chinese Science Grasped, Modern Physics Just Learning.”Www.theepochtimes.com, 12 June 2014, www.theepochtimes.com/3-concepts-ancient-chinese-science-grasped-modern-physics-just-learning_726622.html.


Inexplicable Physics,” The Inexplicable Universe with Neil deGrasse Tyson. Netflix, 2012
Season 1, Episode 4. Accessed 8/11/2018

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biochemistry Paper: The Microbiome and TCM

ACCHS Biochemistry Summer 2018 Professor Spears Sarah Donnelly The Microbiome and TCM The microbiome is an enormously interesting area right now. With steadily rising rates of gastrointestinal disorders, despite all the best that western medicine has to offer, people are looking for a solution which isn't worse than the illness. Clostridium difficile (C.diff) infections alone have doubled in the United States in the last decade. There are many variables which can contribute to all this gut-sickness, but the underlying problem is our western medical model. Our current model, with the finest technology and equipment at its disposal, has distilled all functional parts of the human body – flora and fauna, vitamins, probiotics, antioxidants, amino acids and the like – down to their very basest constituents. We have the machines which tell us exactly which nutrients we lack, and we pack it into pills and swallow it down. This is our preventative medicine. The body ...

Physics - Synchronicity

Prompt:  "What evidence can you find for synchronicity Based on what you know, how would you explain connectivity?" This is such an interesting subject. It gets me tangled up and I don't know if I'm able to write about it. How to write a blog post on something I know to be true and real but don't have the vocabulary to describe it satisfactorily to another party.  Who's satisfaction?  Synchronicity depends wholly on the witness - who is viewing it?  A synchronistic event can't be untangled from its viewer(s). Should it be? Does synchronicity need to be recognized?  Any evidence I have for synchronicity is going to be subjective, and describing a subjective experience isn't evidence in a laboratory-objective-textbook way. And that's where I get stuck. I want to come across as very logical and full of right angles, and this subject is very irregularly-shaped.  This entanglement idea - that teeny tiny bits in me are unfathomably connected to...

Physics: Loafing Around Without Feeling Guilty

Dictionary.com has 'loafing' as 1.  to idle away time: 2. to lounge or saunter lazily and idly This is so easy in theory! In the middle of a class, I'll be dreaming about sleeping in until noon, eating ice cream for breakfast, and staying up late reading trashy novels. In practice, my teenage dreams are mostly beyond the capabilities of my 30-something body. My eyes open at 6am, whether I want it or not; ice cream is now known as 'the triple yin death', and 10pm is really way too late for me anymore.  So I took this assignment to mean do something relaxing that I wouldn't normally do. I planned out a perfect 2-daygetaway for the semester break. This took lots of time to dream about, play with maps and restaurant and beach reviews, all of which was very satisfying. For this, I have realistic goals - I'll be up and to bed early but in between, no one will be able to ask anything of me, and nothing work or school like will be scheduled. I'll hav...